New York Times Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement in AI Training

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

September 4, 2024
|
By Jiten Surve

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The lawsuit contends that the unauthorized use of the Times' copyrighted articles and content for AI development undermines the newspaper's ability to deliver its services. Emphasizing the significance of independent journalism in democracy, the lawsuit highlights the unique value of the Times' reporting.

This legal move by the publisher echoes similar cases, including actions by authors and other entities concerned about the proliferation of AI systems using copyrighted material without proper authorization.

There’s growing concern around AI models using content without providing proper credit or incentives to access the original sources. Despite ongoing discussions between the New York Times and OpenAI, marked by attempts to find a resolution, the lawsuit emerged following a deadlock in negotiations.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about AI-generated "hallucinations," instances where false information gets linked incorrectly to a source. It points to instances on Microsoft's Bing Chat where content was attributed to the Times inaccurately.

While the lawsuit doesn’t specify a monetary claim, it urges accountability from OpenAI (valued at $80 billion) and Microsoft (valued at $2.8 trillion) for significant statutory and actual damages. It also demands the destruction of any AI models or training data utilizing copyrighted material from the Times.

Amidst these tensions, OpenAI has announced partnerships aimed at addressing concerns over content usage. One recent collaboration involves working with Axel Springer, a major German publishing company, to incorporate authoritative content into ChatGPT while ensuring proper attribution and transparency to original sources.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the lawsuit, while OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment over the legal action, citing ongoing, constructive discussions with the New York Times.

  • Featured tools
Murf Ai
Free

Murf AI Review – Advanced AI Voice Generator for Realistic Voiceovers

#
Text to Speech
Learn more
Writesonic AI
Free

Writesonic AI is a versatile AI writing platform designed for marketers, entrepreneurs, and content creators. It helps users create blog posts, ad copies, product descriptions, social media posts, and more with ease. With advanced AI models and user-friendly tools, Writesonic streamlines content production and saves time for busy professionals.

#
Copywriting
Learn more

Learn more about future of AI

Join 80,000+ Ai enthusiast getting weekly updates on exciting AI tools.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

New York Times Files Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement in AI Training

September 4, 2024

By Jiten Surve

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement over the utilization of its content to train artificial intelligence models. Filed in a Manhattan federal court, the lawsuit claims that while these companies compiled data from various sources, they heavily relied on New York Times material without permission or compensation.

The lawsuit contends that the unauthorized use of the Times' copyrighted articles and content for AI development undermines the newspaper's ability to deliver its services. Emphasizing the significance of independent journalism in democracy, the lawsuit highlights the unique value of the Times' reporting.

This legal move by the publisher echoes similar cases, including actions by authors and other entities concerned about the proliferation of AI systems using copyrighted material without proper authorization.

There’s growing concern around AI models using content without providing proper credit or incentives to access the original sources. Despite ongoing discussions between the New York Times and OpenAI, marked by attempts to find a resolution, the lawsuit emerged following a deadlock in negotiations.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about AI-generated "hallucinations," instances where false information gets linked incorrectly to a source. It points to instances on Microsoft's Bing Chat where content was attributed to the Times inaccurately.

While the lawsuit doesn’t specify a monetary claim, it urges accountability from OpenAI (valued at $80 billion) and Microsoft (valued at $2.8 trillion) for significant statutory and actual damages. It also demands the destruction of any AI models or training data utilizing copyrighted material from the Times.

Amidst these tensions, OpenAI has announced partnerships aimed at addressing concerns over content usage. One recent collaboration involves working with Axel Springer, a major German publishing company, to incorporate authoritative content into ChatGPT while ensuring proper attribution and transparency to original sources.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the lawsuit, while OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment over the legal action, citing ongoing, constructive discussions with the New York Times.

Promote Your Tool

Copy Embed Code

Similar Blogs

January 16, 2026
|

Wikipedia Partners with Microsoft, Meta, & Perplexity on AI Push

A major development unfolded today as Wikipedia, marking its 25th anniversary, announced strategic AI partnerships with Microsoft, Meta, and Perplexity. These alliances aim to integrate generative AI technologies into the platform.
Read more
January 16, 2026
|

X Under Fire Over Sexualized AI Content

Governments and regulators may leverage this case to draft or enforce stricter AI content policies. Analysts advise that companies integrating generative AI should reassess risk management frameworks.
Read more
January 16, 2026
|

AI to Transform Human Work and Augment Skills, Signals Strategic Shift in Workforce Policy

The initiatives focus on upskilling employees in AI literacy, human-AI collaboration, and data-driven decision-making. Economic impacts include increased productivity, innovation in service delivery.
Read more
January 16, 2026
|

Taiwan Emerges as Strategic AI Ally in U.S. Tariff Deal

U.S. officials reportedly welcome Taiwan’s commitment to AI development, signaling mutual interest in secure supply chains and technology standardization. Corporate leaders in AI and semiconductors.
Read more
January 16, 2026
|

AI in Healthcare Payers: Market Transformation Outlook

A major development has emerged in the healthcare sector as AI adoption among payers is projected to accelerate sharply from 2026 to 2033. The market outlook highlights transformative opportunities for insurers.
Read more
January 16, 2026
|

IIT Indore Unveils Human-Like AI Replica to Revolutionize Disease Detection and Diagnostics

Industry observers note that innovations like this could influence global standards for AI-powered diagnostics. Investors and healthcare providers may see opportunities in adopting AI-assisted systems.
Read more